How to Give Feedback That Doesn't Crush Souls

Related Reading: What to Anticipate from Communication Skills Training | Emotional Intelligence Training Melbourne | Managing Difficult Conversations | Team Development Training

The day I made Sarah from accounting cry was the day I realised I was doing feedback all wrong.

There I was, fresh-faced manager in my second week, thinking I was being "direct and honest" when I told her that her monthly reports looked like they'd been assembled by a caffeinated wombat during a Melbourne Cup bender. Sarah's face crumpled, she mumbled something about "trying her best," and suddenly I felt like the world's biggest tosser.

That was fifteen years ago, and it taught me the most important lesson of my career: giving feedback isn't about being right, it's about being helpful. And there's a massive bloody difference between the two.

The Problem With Most Feedback

Here's what I've observed after working with hundreds of managers across Sydney, Brisbane, and Perth: most people treat feedback like a drive-by shooting. They wait until something's really wrong, then unload both barrels and expect the other person to thank them for it.

Wrong approach entirely.

The statistics are sobering. According to recent workplace studies, 78% of employees say they've received feedback that made them feel worse about their performance rather than motivated to improve. That's not feedback - that's just organisational bullying with better vocabulary.

I've seen this pattern repeat itself in companies from Woolworths to Telstra to small family businesses in Geelong. Managers think they're being "honest" when they're actually being destructive. They confuse bluntness with clarity, criticism with coaching.

The worst part? Most of these managers genuinely believe they're helping. They've confused "tough love" with effective communication, and the results are predictably disastrous.

What Actually Works: The Aussie Approach

Let me share what I've learned works, particularly in Australian workplace culture where we value straight talking but also mateship.

First, timing is everything. Don't wait for the quarterly review to mention that someone's been mucking up their client presentations for three months. That's not feedback - that's ambush management. Proper listening skills training teaches you to pick up on issues early, before they become performance problems.

Second, context matters more than content. I learned this the hard way after my Sarah incident. Instead of launching into what's wrong, start with why it matters. "Sarah, I want to chat about the monthly reports because they're crucial for board meetings, and I know you want to showcase your brilliant analysis properly."

See the difference? Same message, completely different delivery.

Third - and this is where most managers fall flat on their face - you need to make it collaborative. Stop lecturing and start exploring. "What do you think went well this month?" "Where do you reckon we could tighten things up?" "How can I support you better?"

This isn't touchy-feely nonsense. It's practical psychology.

The Three-Step Method That Actually Works

After years of trial and error (and quite a few more Sarahs along the way), I've developed what I call the "Sandwich Shop Method." No, it's not the old compliment-criticism-compliment formula that everyone knows is fake. It's something different.

Step One: The Setup Start with genuine curiosity, not judgement. "I've been thinking about your presentation yesterday, and I'd love to get your thoughts on how it went." This immediately shifts the dynamic from authority-subordinate to colleague-colleague.

Step Two: The Exploration Here's where emotional intelligence training becomes invaluable. Ask questions that help them discover the issues themselves. "What parts felt strongest to you?" "If you were doing it again tomorrow, what would you change?" "What support would have been helpful beforehand?"

Most people know when they've stuffed up. They just need permission to acknowledge it without feeling like they're signing their redundancy papers.

Step Three: The Partnership This is where you move from feedback to forward planning. "Right, so what's our game plan for next time?" "How can we set you up for success?" "What resources do you need?"

The key insight here is that feedback isn't a performance review - it's a planning session for future success.

Why Most Training Gets This Wrong

I've sat through dozens of management training courses over the years, and most of them teach feedback like it's a legal deposition. They focus on documentation, defensibility, and covering your arse rather than actually helping people improve.

That's backwards thinking.

The best feedback I ever received came from my old boss Jenny at a consulting firm in Adelaide. She pulled me aside after I'd botched a client meeting and said, "Mate, you've got brilliant ideas, but you're presenting them like you're apologising for having them. Let's work on that confidence piece."

No drama, no formal process, no bloody feedback sandwich. Just clear observation, specific issue, and a path forward. That five-minute conversation changed my entire approach to client relationships.

Compare that to the formal performance reviews I've endured where managers spend twenty minutes reading from a script about "areas for development" and "growth opportunities." Absolute waste of everyone's time.

The Australian Context Makes It Complicated

Here's something most American management books miss: Australian workplace culture has some unique challenges when it comes to feedback. We're informal enough that people expect straight talking, but we're also conflict-averse enough that many managers avoid difficult conversations entirely.

I've worked with teams where serious performance issues went unaddressed for months because the manager was worried about "being too harsh" or "hurting feelings." Then when they finally did address it, they overcorrected and came across like a complete bastard.

The sweet spot is what I call "caring directness." You can be absolutely clear about what needs to change while still treating someone like a human being worth investing in. It's not rocket science, but it does require practice.

Common Mistakes That Kill Feedback

After fifteen years of watching managers stuff this up, here are the biggest mistakes I see:

The Data Dump: Saving up six months of issues and unloading them all at once. This doesn't make you thorough - it makes you overwhelming. Deal with things as they come up.

The Vague Gesture: "You need to communicate better" or "Be more proactive." What does that actually mean? Be specific about behaviours, not character traits.

The Guilt Trip: "I'm disappointed" or "I expected better from you." This isn't feedback - it's emotional manipulation disguised as management.

The False Urgency: Making everything seem like a crisis when it's just normal workplace stuff that needs tweaking. Save the drama for actual emergencies.

But the biggest mistake? Thinking feedback is something you do TO someone rather than WITH someone.

Making It Stick: Implementation Reality

Here's the thing about feedback that most management gurus won't tell you: the conversation is only about 30% of the process. The follow-up is where the real work happens.

I learned this from watching a brilliant operations manager in Perth who had a simple rule: every feedback conversation ended with a specific check-in date. Not "let's see how you go" - an actual calendar appointment two weeks later to review progress.

This isn't micromanagement. It's accountability with support.

She'd also do something clever - she'd ask people what they wanted her to look for. "When I observe your next client call, what should I pay attention to?" This turned monitoring from surveillance into coaching.

The results spoke for themselves. Her team had the lowest turnover in the company and consistently hit their targets. More importantly, people actually sought out her feedback because they trusted it would help them improve.

The Technology Trap

Quick tangent here, but I need to rant about feedback apps and performance management software. These systems promise to make feedback more systematic and objective, but they often make it more bureaucratic and less human.

I've watched managers hide behind these platforms, typing sanitised comments into drop-down menus instead of having real conversations. That's not progress - that's digitalised cowardice.

The best feedback happens in person, in the moment, with genuine human connection. Technology can support this, but it can't replace it.

Although I'll admit, some of the newer collaboration tools do make it easier to track development goals and celebrate progress. Just don't mistake the tool for the technique.

What Great Feedback Actually Sounds Like

Let me give you some real examples from conversations I've had recently:

Instead of: "Your presentation skills need work." Try: "I noticed you had some really insightful points about market trends, but I think they got a bit lost in the delivery. Want to brainstorm some ways to make those insights really land with the audience?"

Instead of: "You're not meeting your sales targets." Try: "Let's look at your pipeline together and see where we might be able to fine-tune your approach. What's your read on where the best opportunities are?"

Instead of: "You need to be more organised." Try: "I've noticed you're juggling heaps of priorities right now. What systems are working for you, and where do you feel like things are slipping through the cracks?"

See how these examples focus on behaviour, invite collaboration, and assume positive intent? That's not being soft - that's being smart.

The Long Game Perspective

Here's what took me years to understand: great feedback is an investment in someone's career, not just your immediate team needs. When you help someone genuinely improve, you're not just solving today's problems - you're building capability for tomorrow's challenges.

I still get LinkedIn messages from people I managed years ago, thanking me for feedback conversations that helped shape their careers. That's not because I was particularly brilliant - it's because I learned to focus on their development rather than my frustrations.

The managers who get this right build reputations that attract top talent. People want to work for someone who will help them grow, not just point out their mistakes.

And here's the business case that will resonate with any CFO: teams with strong feedback cultures have 47% higher employee retention and 23% better performance outcomes. Those aren't feel-good statistics - they're bottom-line impacts.

The irony is that giving better feedback actually makes your job easier in the long run. When people trust your input and know how to improve, you spend less time firefighting and more time on strategic work.

Where Most People Get Stuck

The biggest barrier I see isn't knowledge - it's courage. Managers know they should give more feedback, but they're terrified of the conversation going sideways.

Fair enough. I've had feedback sessions that turned into tears, arguments, and awkward silences. But here's what I learned: most of the time, people are relieved to finally talk about the elephant in the room.

That project that's been struggling? They know it. The client relationship that's gone cold? They've been worried about it too. The skill gap that's holding them back? They're probably more frustrated about it than you are.

Your job isn't to deliver shocking revelations - it's to create a safe space for honest conversation about things everyone already knows need attention.

The Bottom Line

Fifteen years after making Sarah cry, I ran into her at a conference in Melbourne. She'd been promoted twice and was running her own team. We had a laugh about that awful feedback conversation, and she told me something that stuck with me: "You know, even though it was terrible at the time, it taught me how NOT to give feedback to my team."

Sometimes the best lessons come from the worst examples.

But here's what I wish I'd known back then: giving feedback that helps rather than hurts isn't about being nicer or softer. It's about being more effective. It's about understanding that your job as a manager isn't to be right - it's to help other people be successful.

The techniques I've shared aren't revolutionary. They're just human. Treat people like intelligent adults who want to do good work, give them specific and actionable guidance, and support them in making improvements.

Most importantly, remember that feedback is a conversation, not a monologue. The moment you start lecturing instead of exploring, you've lost the opportunity to actually help someone grow.

And if you do make someone cry (and statistically, you probably will at some point), don't just apologise and move on. Use it as a learning moment for both of you. Ask what would have been more helpful. Adjust your approach for next time.

Because in the end, great feedback isn't about what you say - it's about what the other person learns. And that's a skill worth developing, no matter how many years you've been managing people.

The workplace needs more managers who see feedback as coaching, not criticism. Be one of them.